Do you know about - 2009 Year End Reviews - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly From the American Political Class
Donating A Car! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.Throughout 2009, while the country and its citizens were facing a terrible economy, foreign wars, ultimate Congressional partisanship and sniping, no improvements in the major issues facing this country such as the soaring national debt, high unemployment, failing group schools, wide spread drug addiction problems, rising condition care costs, and other major issues, what were the politicians worried about? seeing back on 2009, there appears to have been three clear categories of American political class behavior: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly.
What I said. It is not outcome that the real about Donating A Car. You see this article for info on an individual want to know is Donating A Car.How is 2009 Year End Reviews - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly From the American Political Class
The Good
By all accounts, 2009 was a rough year in America. The good news is that I could for real identify some areas where the political class did some good things. The bad news is I could only come up with three examples where the actions of the political class had taxpayers and fellow citizens in mind when they executed their actions:
1) The first example is based on personal experience. I live in Pinellas county in Florida and over the past four years my asset taxes have gone down on a year over year basis. They have gone down so much that I now pay about 40% in less in asset taxes today than I paid four years ago with a primary part of that decrease occurring in 2009. There are probably a estimate of factors, both political and non-political, that have gone into this decrease but the lowest line is that they have gone down significantly. And here is the good news: I still have police protection, I still have fire protection, the schools are still open, the parks are still open, most of the libraries are still open and the roads and traffic lights are still in good shape. This is proof, that on a very local level, excess waste can be taken out of government without grand allowance in primary security and services. The customary word in that former sentence is essential.
2) The second example comes from the U.S. Senate and it was a advice and formal proposal to the Senate from Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee. His reasoning: since the Federal government paid about billion of U.S. Taxpayer money to secure a 60% share of general Motors and theoretically save it from bankruptcy, should not each American taxpayer get stock certificates and partial possession of Gm rather than the Washington bureaucrats? After all, since government is able to function only because it takes money from taxpayers, if government acquires possession in a incommunicable company, doesn't that mean that the taxpayers own the company since it was their money? Senator Alexander was the single politician this year that showed he understood the association between paying taxes and government spending. Giving individual citizens those shares of Gm would ensure more interest in how Gm performed going forward since each population would have had a stake in its survival, probably giving Gm a best shot at survival than it has with government ownership. Unfortunately, the Senator's advice was not stylish by the Senate.
3) The final example comes from a small town in south Florida, Miami Gardens. In the past year, Miami Gardens city government took the following actions:
- The city payroll grew. Most anywhere else in the country unemployment increased.
- City employees still got cost of living raises and merit raises. Most anywhere else in the country
salaries and wages were freezing or reduced.
- The city increased its financial reserves by about 0,000. Most anywhere else in the country, local
and state governments dipped into their reserves to cover operating costs.
- The city upgraded 17 parks and 4 schools. Most other government entities were reducing or eliminating maintenance projects.
How was Miami Gardens able to do all of these clear things in light of a very, very deep recession and the fact that they are not a city of wealthy residents? agreeing to interviews with city officials:
- City employees share both personnel resources and other resources.
- The city hires only those population they for real need to do the work needed to be done.
- City officials claim they have the capability and backbone to say "No" to non-essential projects and programs, claiming that they cannot be all to everybody.
- Thus, much like the first example above, the Miami Gardens politicians have shown that running a lean, effective government doing is possible if you are respectful of taxpayers' dollars. All it takes is a microscopic planning and the capability to just say No.
The Bad
In life you have to take the good with the bad so now lets spin some of the less than glorious antics that the political class served us with in the second half of 2009:
- Ginny Brown-Waite, a Congresswoman from Florida, was actively investing in bank stocks at the same time she was sitting on the House banking committee to resolve which banks got what levels of bailout money and preserve from the American taxpayer through the Federal government. This is a blatant disagreement of interest. Ordinary Americans would probably have gone to jail for insider trading if they did the same thing, apparently disagreement of interest and insider trading activities do not apply to Congressional members.
- Senator Hillary Clinton apparently also does not understand disagreement of interest theory. She helped pass a bill that allowed a mall developer in New York state to get preferential tax treatment, shortly after the developer made a primary donation to Bill Clinton's foundation.
- Hawaiian Senator Daniel Inouye's staff helped a bank in Hawaii get bailout money from the Fdic after the the Fdic determined the bank was not worth saving. Turns out that the Senator had invested heavily in the bank and stood to lose a load of money unless the bank was saved by the American taxpayer.
- Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut received grand campaign donations from Fannie Me and Freddie Mac. Two things wrong here. First, Dodd was chairman of the Senate banking committee responsible for overseeing the activities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a clear cut case of disagreement of interest. Second, how do two Federal organizations that exist now solely because of taxpayer preserve and bailout money get to use taxpayer money to preserve definite candidates for office? Shouldn not government organizations remain non-partisan and not a piggy bank for the politicians who are supposed to oversee them?
- Ex-Congressman William Jefferson of Louisiana was convicted of taking bribes and was sentenced to 13 years in prison. You may recall that Mr. Jefferson was caught with freezing bribe money in his home freezer. This continues the hall of shame tradition of the political class who recently included Congressman Randy Cunningham who was sentenced to eight years in prison for taking .4 million in bribes, Congressman Bill Ney who was sentenced to two and a half years in prison for taking bribes, Congressman James Traficant who was sentenced to seven years in prison for taking bribes, and the majority of ex-Governors of Illinois who are whether serving prison time, have served prison time, or may soon face prison time.
- 60% of the Congressional members sitting on the House Armed Services Committee received campaign contributions from the very fellowships that they had previously earmarked pork barrel funds money for.
Congressman Charles Rangel of New York is being investigated for a estimate of ethics violations including, but not microscopic to, non-declaration of rental income, clear assets, and other income.
- In the area of "who for real cares about this bill", Congresswoman Anna Eshoo of California and her staff are working on legislation to Federally regulate the sound volume on television commercials. Never mind that Tv watchers can mute the sound, turn the channel, leave the room to get something to eat, fast forward on their Dvr machines, or just ignore the Tv for 60 seconds. Why work on Iraq, Afghanistan, soaring deficits, unemployment, failing group schools, etc. When the Tv industrial sound volume issue is so pressing?
- In the same vein as Ms. Eshoo's offering to America, Congressman Jim Moran and his staff are investigating whether erectile dysfunction television commercials should be banned. I did not know this was so foremost either. As with Ms. Eshoo, let's ignore real issues facing America and work on E.D. Commercials.
- And it never ends. Congressman Thaddeus McCotter and his staff is working on legislation to furnish up to 0 a month in revenue tax deductions so that the unemployed do not have to put their pets up for adoption. Maybe if his staff and he were working on how to get America working again, there would be no need for this ridiculous program that would never be able to be tracked and would be rife with fraud.
Worse than individual Congress population and their staffs working on trivial bills, how about an entire House subcommittee worked on legislation aimed at forcing the Ncaa to go to a playoff format to resolve the best branch One college football team? Where would this issue rank with the vast majority of Americans today? Probably not very high.
- The fence along the border between America and Mexico was the work of the entire Congress. A 2009 article documented that the building of the fence is seven years behind schedule, it will cost .4 billion to enounce the fence over the next twenty years (0,000 a day!), and there have been at least 3,000 breaches of the fence where illegal immigrants were able to enter the country despite this billion dollar fence.
- The new Washington D.C. Visitors' center was completed but only after it overran it's building funds by about 50%.
- Congressman Henry Waxman was quoted as saying: "I for real don't claim to know all that is in this bill" in referring to the immense cap and trade legislation that is likely to come before Congress in 2010. The troubling aspect of this statement is that Waxman is the valid co-author and writer of the bill!
- Recently, who could forget the blatant bribes the recently passed condition care reform bill required where a handful of Democratic Senators were able to get breaks for their individual states to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars in change for their final vote in preserve of this bill.
If these actions were not serious and far reaching, they would be comical. Conflicts of interest, trivial projects, wastes of money, sad but true in 2009.
The Ugly
It has been said that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. However, it is difficult to find much beauty in any of the following Federally funded projects since they waste Federal tax dollars on local projects that lead nothing to solving the major, national issues facing the country today. The only beauty is in the eye of incumbent politicians who waste these taxpayer dollars to preserve their re-election efforts:
- Exhibits at the Teddy Roosevelt Inaugural Site Foundation - 0,000
- rehabilitation of the Portsmouth, New Hampshire Music Hall - ,000,000
- rehabilitation of the uptown Theater in Philadelphia - 0,000
- building of the Monroe County (Kentucky) Farmers' store - 0,000
- rehabilitation of the Murphy Theater in Ohio - 0,000
- rehabilitation of the Slater Mill in Rhode Island - 4,000
- rehabilitation of the Pregone Theater in the Bronx - 0,000
- building of the Santa Ana River Trail in California - 0,000
- Funding for the Myrtle Beach International Trade and argument center - 0,000
- Funding for the Washington (state) Opera - 0,000
- Funding for the Montana World Trade center - 4,000
- Funding for the Arkansas industrial Driver Training design - 0,000
- Funding to study and educate citizens about the role and point of the U.S. Senate, settled in- Massachusetts - ,900,000
- Funding for the Brown Tree Snake Program, funding that was embedded in the 2010 Defense branch funds - 0,000
- renovation of the Ritz Theater in Newburgh, New York - 0,000
- renovation of the Laredo microscopic Theater in Lardeo, Texas - 0,000
- Widening of Bristol street in Santa Ana, California - 0,000
- building of a bike path in Port Sanilax, Michigan - 0,000
- Funding for the Museum Of Aviation - 0,000
- Funding for the World Food Prize in Iowa - 0,000
- Questionable Medicare claims together with such, as an example, paying for blood glucose strips for sexual impotence - ,000,000,000
- Government waste due to improper payments over all Federal government departments - ,000,000,000
- Conversion of 21 cabooses into a caboose motel in Pennsylvania - 0,000
- Funding for a remote Pennsylvania airport that serves about twenty passengers a day - 0,000,000
- Funding for a state of the art radar system for that remote Pennsylvania airport that has never been used - ,000,000
- Funding for a remote Montana border checkpoint at the Canadian border that handles about three travelers a day on average and less than 0 of freight a day on average - ,000,000
- Funding for the Polynesian Voyaging society in Hawaii - 8,000
- Funding for the Forage Animal yield investigate Lab in Kentucky- ,600,000
- Funding for Swine Odor and Manure management investigate in Iowa - ,790,000
- Funding for oyster rehabilitation in Alabama - 0,000
- preserve of condition and economic development activities for the Arctic region - ,600,000
- A loan to a California company to design and build an high-priced hybrid sports car.... In Finland - 9,000,000
These are just a merge dozen programs that waste hard earned taxpayer dollars. The 2010 funds bills have over 11,000 other such programs, even though President Obama campaigned to keep the estimate of pork projects like these well under 2,000. The reasons we have state and local governments is to deal with state and local needs. It should not be the role of the Federal government to fund local bike paths, widen local roads, renovate theaters, etc. It diverts time, money, and resources from the truly national problems like the two wars we are currently complex in, soaring Federal deficits, high unemployment levels, group security and Medicare heading for insolvency, failing group schools, high drug addiction rates and the connected crime problems, the lacking of a national strategic energy plan, etc.
Then why does the political class spend/waste time and money on these clearly local issues and needs? It helps guarantee them re-election by attempting to prove to their own voters that they are adept at stealing money from other U.S. Taxpayers and funneling into their home districts and states. Remember, the government pays for nothing, it funds programs with taxpayer money taken from all American taxpayers. Thus, the bike trail in Michigan is being financed in part by taxpayers in Arizona who will never ride that trail. The Polynesian Voyaging society is being funded in part by taxpayers in Vermont who will never get any benefits from the Society.
A long time ago, the statue Of Liberty, an enduing sticker of this entire country and its freedom, was in badly need of fix and renovation. The country rose up to secretly donate adequate funds to restore this national symbol. If the statue Of liberty did not merit Federal money any decades ago, why do farmers' markets and bike paths merit such Federal preserve today?
This pilfering of national tax dollars perhaps hides a more hazardous reality. It could be that this generation of politicians, and the ones that have come immediately before them, do not know how to solve the real national problems facing America today. In the 1960s, Nixon declared war on drugs but we still have a major drug problem in this country. In the 1970s, Carter was President when we lived through the energy crises but we still no do not have a national strategic energy program in place. In the early 1980s, the Reagan management identified the danger of our failing group school systems but today many of our group schools are still failing. In the 1990s, despite numerous wake-up calls (first World Trade center attacks, U.S. Embassy terrorist bombings in Africa, Uss Cole attack, etc.) we still do not have the terrorist threat under control, as witnessed by the approximately catastrophic airline security breakdown on the Christmas day Klm flight into Detroit.
Thus, it could be that our current politicians work on useless and wasteful local spending programs and worry about the sound volume on television commercials because they are incapable of doing whatever else. If they were, than many of our national problems would have been addressed and solved already. That is why the following steps need to be taken to start reducing "The Bad" and "The Ugly" and expanding the "The Good" from the political class:
Step 1 - start reducing Federal spending by 10% a year, for five years, in order to begin weeding out the wasteful, but politically convenient, local wastes of money.
Step 2 - allow only individual citizens to lead to political choosing campaigns since many of the wasteful programs are for real bribes, directing taxpayer dollars to companies, unions, and lobbyists in order to get reciprocal campaign donations for incumbents' re-election campaigns.
Step 3 - hold Congressional committee and subcommittee members accountable for their performance, removing them from committee posts when their efforts are unsatisfactory and wasteful.
Step 4 - design term limits for all Senators and Congressmen since allowing them to serve forever is not working. If the President, the most foremost elected valid in the world, has term limits, less foremost Senate and House of Representative seats should also be microscopic in term length.
Step 5 - no Federal money could be spent on any program or task unless it materially affects a grand estimate of residents in at least five states, i.e. Spend Federal tax dollars on national needs, let state and local governments and incommunicable citizens deal with the local needs.
While "The Good, The Bad and The Ugly" made for a good Clint Eastwood movie, it does not make for effective and effective governance. Lets hope that 2010 is best and that somehow some of the steps listed above take hold this year, resulting in a 2010 list of wasteful spending programs and negative political antics that is far smaller than in 2009, less bad and ugly and more good.
Note: only credible, well known news sources were used for the information included in this article. These sources included, but were not microscopic to, the New York Times, the St. Petersburg Times, Cnn, the connected Press, The Week Magazine, and reason Magazine and does not comprise personal opinions or information from very partisan sources. For detailed information on the sources please refer to http://www.loathemygovernment.blogspot.com where all of these facts and figures have been previously identified and discussed.
I hope you have new knowledge about Donating A Car. Where you possibly can put to used in your day-to-day life. And just remember, your reaction is Donating A Car.Read more.. 2009 Year End Reviews - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly From the American Political Class. View Related articles related to Donating A Car. I Roll below. I have suggested my friends to assist share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share 2009 Year End Reviews - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly From the American Political Class.
No comments:
Post a Comment